مدل‌سازی اجرای اقتضایی خصوصی‌سازی در راستای تحقق بند «ب» مادۀ 3 اصل 44 قانون اساسی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، رشتۀ مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد زنجان، زنجان، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این تحقیق، تدوین روش اجرای نظام‌مند اصل 44 قانون اساسی با عطف به مواد مندرج در قانون مذکور است. با توجه به مواد فصل دوم اصل 44 و تعیین سهم بخش‌های مختلف فعالیت‌های اقتصادی، در این پژوهش، مدل خصوصی‌سازی به‌صورت مطالعۀ موردی در شرکت راه‌آهن ج.ا.ا. (اشاره‌شده در بندهای مادۀ 3 اصل 44) براساس رویکرد استنتاج فازی ارائه شده است. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و براساس ماهیت و روش، توصیفی ـ پیمایشی بود. استادان دانشگاه، و متخصصان، مدیران و خبرگان آشنا به حوزۀ صنعت ریلی و راه‌آهن جامعۀ آماری تحقیق را تشکیل داد. حجم نمونه براساس روش زنجیره‌ای یا گلوله‌برفی، ده نفر انتخاب شد. داده‌های تحقیق با استفاده از رویکرد استنتاج فازی به‌کمک نرم‌افزار متلب (MATLAB) تجزیه‌وتحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد مطلوب‌ترین روش برای خصوصی‌سازی در راه‌آهن روش پیمان مدیریت است که میزان مطلوبیت آن برابر با 859/0 بود که در این روش، عامل فرهنگی مؤثرترین مؤلفه و عامل اقتصادی کم‌اثرترین مؤلفه ارزیابی شد. روش‌های عرضۀ سهام به عموم (822/0) با اولویت عامل سیاسی و قانونی و روش پیمان‌سپاری (810/0) با اولویت عامل اطلاعاتی در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار گرفت. همچنین کمترین مطلوبیت برای روش تجزیۀ واحدهای بزرگ‌تر به واحدهای کوچک‌تر با مقدار 608/0 به‌دست آمد. بنابراین لازم است مدیران صنعت ریلی در روش‌های خصوصی‌سازی، با توجه به اقتضائات حاکم بر این صنعت، از بهترین روش استفاده کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Required Implementation of Privatization Modeling (Article 3 of Principle 44 of the Constitution)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Nasiri Vahed 1
  • Gholamreza Memarzadeh Tehran 2
  • Saeed Sayyad Shirkosh 3
1 PhD Candidate of Public Management, Faculty of Managment, Islamic Azad University Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Managment, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Managment, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to provide a method of systematic implementation of Article 44 of the Constitution and its references. According to the second chapter of Article 44 focusing on the contribution of different sectors of economic activities, in this study, the privatization model in The Railways of The Islamic Republic of Iran organization (referred to in clauses of 3rd principle of Article 44) is presented based on Fuzzy inference system. In terms of purpose, this study is practical, and it is considered as a descriptive survey research. University professors, specialists, managers, and experts familiar with the field of railway industry formed the statistical community of the research. Ten individuals were selected based on chain-referral or Snowball sampling. The research data was analyzed using fuzzy inference system with the help of MATLAB software. The results indicated that the most preferrable method for privatization in the railways is the management contract with a value of 0.859; moreover, in this method, the cultural and economic factors were evaluated as the most and the least effective elements, respectively. Offering shares to the public with the priority of political and legal factor (0.822) and the contracting method with the priority of informative factor (0.810) were put in the next ranks. In addition, the least favorable one was the method of dividing larger units into smaller ones (0.608). Therefore, it is vital that the managers of railway industry use the best method of privatization based on the terms and conditions of this industry.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Privatization
  • Fuzzy Inference
  • railway
Abdeldayem, M. M., & Dulaimi, S. H. A. (2019). Privatisation as a worldwide tool of economic reform: A literature Review. International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences4(2), 66-84.
Abrol, M. (2016). Emerging trends of privatization of education in India. International Journal of Educational Administration8(1), 1-6.
Adeyemi, R. A., & Muhammed Subhan, M. H. B. J. (2017). The privatization of telecommunications sector in Nigeria: prospects and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business Economics, and Management1(1), 1-20.
Ahmadi, L., Bemanian, M., & Sobhieh, M. (2007). The possibility of implementing urban management projects using the BOT contract [Paper presentation]. International Project Management Conference, Tehran. (Persain)
Ashton, P., Doussard, M., & Weber, R. (2012). The financial engineering of infrastructure privatization: What are public assets worth to private investors?. Journal of the American Planning Association78(3), 300-312.
Asna Ashari, A., & Etemadnia, M. (2011). Theoretical comparison of various privatization methods and the applicability of these methods in transferring telephone centers’ ownerships to the private sector. Economic Journal, 11(1-2), 111-130. (Persain)
Assenova-Velikova, M. G. (2016). The Cconcepts and Process of an Initial Public Offering of Shares in Bulgaria. 13(1), 19-26.
Azar, A., Gholipour, R., Alvani, S. M., Komeyjani, A., & Mohammadi, E. (2011). Designing a comprehensive model of privatization and transfer of state-owned enterprises in Iran with a policy approach. Management Research in Iran, 15(4), 29-49. (Persain)
Bajra, U. Q., Krasniqi, A., & Podvorica, A. (2021). Privatisation of socially owned enterprises, the methods used and the impact on economic growth: empirical evidence from Kosovo. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 13(34), 1-18.
Bian, X., Li, W., Hu, J., Liu, H., Duan, X., & Chen, Y. (2018). Geodynamics of high-speed railway. Transportation Geotechnics5(17), 69-76.
Cashore, B. (2017). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. In International Environmental Governance, 15(4), 339-361.
Dan, S. et al. (2012). Effects of privatization and agencification on citizens and citizenship: an international comparison. Received from: https://www.researchgate.net/ 2021
Erfan, A. M. (2013). Buying Peace in Syria: Drawing Lessons From Iraq. Report of Al Jazeera Center for Studies. Received from: https://studies.aljazeera.net/en/reports/2013/02/20132209526299197.html
Feige, E. L. (2017). The transition to a market economy in Russia: property rights, mass privatization and stabilization. In A Fourth Way?. Received from: https://www.researchgate.net/ 2021
Glaister, S. (2004). Competition destroyed by politics: British Rail privatisation. Confrance of Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries (CRI) Occasional. The University of Bath School of Management.
Gnes, M. (2017). Do administrative law principles apply to european standardization: Agencification or privatization?. Legal Issues of Economic Integration44(4), 367-380.
Goel, R. K., & Budak, J. (2006). Privatization in transition economies: Privatization scale and country size. Economic Systems30(1), 98-110.
Gradus, R., Dijkgraaf, E., & Wassenaar, M. (2014). Understanding mixed forms of refuse collection, privatization, and its reverse in the Netherlands. International Public Management Journal17(3), 328-343.
Han, S. S., & Pannell, C. W. (1999). The geography of privatization in China, 1978–1996. Economic Geography75(3), 272-296.
Hashem, E. A. (2014). The effects of corruption on government expenditures: arab countries experience. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development5(4), 120-130.
Hermann, C., & Flecker, J. (Eds.). (2013). Privatization of public services: Impacts for employment, working conditions, and service quality in Europe (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Ho, C. S. B., & Jones, D. S. (2015). Infrastructure management in Singapore: privatization and government control. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(3), 299-311.
Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public–private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review67(3), 545-558.
Hosseini Golafshan, A. (2003). Effective factors on privatization [Master’s thesis, Unknown]. (Persain)
Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center. (2011, January 20). The law of the fifth five-year development plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1394-1390). Received from: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa (Persain)
Jaafari Sogh, A., & Shahbazi, H. (2015). An overview of Fuzzy inference algorithms [Paper presentation]. The National Conference of New Idea on Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch. (Persain)
Jiang, Y., Peng, M. W., Yang, X., & Mutlu, C. C. (2015). Privatization, governance, and survival: MNE investments in private participation projects in emerging economies. Journal of World Business50(2), 294-301.
Kadkhodazade, H., & Morovvati Sharif Abadi, A. (2013). Supplier selection using fuzzy inference system. Production and Operations Management, 4(2), 113-132. (Persain)
Kharazi, F., & Akkhavan Sales, H. (2016). The rules and regulations for participation and investment in the rail transportation industry. Tehran: Publication of Investment and Transport Economy. (Persain)
Leykun, F. (2020). Privatization modalities and business valuation: An ethiopian focus. Journal of Investment and Management9(1), 12-26.
Li, Z., & Yamada, T. (2015). Political and economic incentives of government in partial privatization. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(32), 169-189.
Memarzadeh, Gh., & Sayad Shirkosh, S. (2010). Modeling the contingent implementation of the general policies of Article 44 of the Constitution (case study of the oil industry). Tehran: Science Production. (Persain)
Miecznikowski, S., & Tłoczyński, D. (2017). Privatization of entities in the air transport sector-airports. In Scientific And Technical Conference Transport Systems Theory And Practice, Springer, Cham.
Moghimi, S. M., Dashti, R., & Bostani, A. (2020). Studying the challenges and obstacles of the privatization of electricity distribution companies. Indian Journal of Science and Technology13(14), 1512-1522.
Mubin, S., & Ghaffar, A. (2016). BOT Contracts: Applicability in Pakistan for infrastructure development. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(3), 33-46.
Norouzi, M., Aasheri, M., & Beladian, S. M. (2015). Critical success factors in the implementation of public-private partnership projects in the field of energy in the Islamic Republic of Iran (case study: electricity industry). Journal of Improvement Management, 9(3), 83-108. (Persain)
Owley, J. (2013). The Increasing Privatization of Environmental Permitting. Akron L. Rev.46(4), 1091-1131.
Puri, B. N. (2003). Private sector participation in the transport sector in India. Transport and Telecommunication Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 22(73), 55-72.
Rahmani, A. (2009). Capital market: Needs for improvement of business environment. Journal of Monetary & Banking Researches, 1(1), 145-175. (Persain)
Rajabi, M. (2017). The call of rail transport. Iran’s Guild of Rail Transport Companies, 1(31), 1-48. (Persain)
Roberts, B. M., & Saeed, M. A. (2012). Privatizations around the world: economic or political determinants?. Economics & Politics24(1), 47-71.
Sayad, S. (2011, April 25). Modeling the contingent implementation of the general policies of Article 44 of the Constitution. Received from: http://drsayyad.com (Persain)
Shafaat, E., Shami Zanjani, M., & Pilevari Salmasi, N. (2011). Presenting a model for evaluating knowledge management enablers in Pasargad Bank using Fuzzy inference system. Researches of Management Organizational Resources, 1(4), 101-123. (Persain)
Sharif Financial and Investment Group. (2010). A comparative study of privatization of road and transportation activities (air, sea, rail and road transportation). Iranian Privatization Organization. https://ipo.ir/uploads/1_96_1520239166844_.pdf (Persain)
Shoji, K., & Killeen, B. J. (2001). Diversification Strategy of the ‘Minor’Private Railway Companies in Japan. International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport, The University of Sydney.
Siegel, D. (2020). Privatization without Capitalism: The Social Relations of Property in Post-Communist Transitions. Polity, 53(1), 1-35.
Termes, A., Edwards Jr, D. B., & Verger, A. (2020). The Development and Dynamics of Public–Private Partnerships in the Philippines’ Education: A Counterintuitive Case of School Choice, Competition, and Privatization. Educational Policy34(1), 91-117.
Valipour Khatir, M., & Ghasemnia Arabi, N. (2016). Fuzzy inference system modeling to assess the potential risks in the medical equipment. Industrial Management Journal, 8(4), 533-554. (Persain)
Wang, M., & Wang, X. (2021, April). Criticisms of Japan’s Current Economic Policies. In 2021 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development, Atlantis Press.
Warfield, D. (2012). Critical infrastructures: IT security and threats from private sector ownership. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective21(3), 127-136.
Wegren, S. K. (2016). Russia's Policy Challenges: Security, Stability and Development: Security, Stability and Development (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Welch, D., & Fremond, O. (1998). The case-by-case approach to privatization: techniques and examples. United States: The World Bank.
Wise, C. R., & Witesman, E. M. (2019). Direct Government Investment: Perverse Privatization or New Tool of Government?. Public Administration Review79(2), 168-179.
Yiranbon, E., Zhou, L. L., Asante Antwi, H., & Nisar, N. (2016). The Impact of Privatisation of Healthcare Equipment and Technology Soes on Productivity in Africa. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 7(26), 195-205.
Zhao, S. (2013). Privatization, FDI inflow and economic growth: evidence from China's provinces, 1978–2008. Applied Economics45(15), 2127-2139.
Zhu, L., & Lipsmeyer, C. S. (2015). Policy feedback and economic risk: the influence of privatization on social policy preferences. Journal of European Public Policy22(10), 1489-1511.