تحلیل ظرفیت بخش های عمده اقتصادی استانهای مختلف ایران از نظر ایجاد ارزش افزوده و چشم انداز آن در افق 1406

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه علوم اقتصادی،دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و رفتاری،دانشگاه بین المللی اهل بیت،تهران،ایران

چکیده

رشد و توسعه مناطق مختلف از مباحث اساسی نظریه‌‌های اقتصاد منطقه‌ای محسوب می‌شود. تجزیه و تحلیل روند تولید و ساختار آن در سطوح مختلف کشور، مستلزم شناخت دقیق استعدادها و توازن بالقوه بخش‌ها و ترکیب آن در مناطق است تا بتوان برنامه‌ریزی متعادلی را در هر بخش از مناطق کشور محقق ساخت. در همین راستا، در این مقاله با استفاده از روش انتقال- سهم به تشخیص بخشهای مزیت دار طی دوره زمانی (1392-1379) پرداخته شده است. نتایج نشان‌دهنده آن است که بیشتر استان‌ها اثر سهم منطقه‌ای مثبت و ساختاری در بخش های کشاورزی ،ماهیگیری ،صنعت، ساختمان ،هتل و رستوران، تامین اب ، برق و گاز طبیعی ، عمده فروشی، خرده فروشی، تعمیر وسایل نقلیه و کالاها، حمل و نقل، انبارداری و ارتباطات ، بهداشت و درمان و مستغلات، کرایه و خدمات کسب و کار دارند و این امر بیان‌کننده مزیت نسبی مناطق در این بخش است..دربخش صنعت اثر مثبت ترکیب صنعتی( ساختاری) و رقابتی استان‌ها ی اصفهان ،ایلام ،بوشهر،چهارمحال و بختیاری ،خوزستان،سمنان ، سیستان و بلوچستان ، فارس ، قم ،کرمانشاه ، گلستان ،مازندران ،هرمزگان و یزد مثبت است که نشاندهنده مزیت نسبی بخش صنعت در این استانها است. بخش اموزش استانهای اذربایجان شرقی، اصفهان، ایلام، تهران، چهار محال بختیاری، سمنان،گلستان،کهگیلویه و بویراحمد، گیلان، مرکزی و بخش اداره عمومی و خدمات شهری استانهای اذربایجان غربی ، ایلام ، تهران، سمنان مزیت نسبی انها ازدست رفته است اما با توجه به این که سهم آنها در اقتصاد هر استان قابل توجه است ریشه‌یابی دلایل عملکرد نامناسب آنها ضرورتی اجتناب ناپذیر دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis capacity of the different Iranian provinces of the main economic sectors in terms of added value and its prospects on the horizon in 1406

نویسنده [English]

  • mohammad ghaffary fard
al bet international university
چکیده [English]

The development of different areas of regional economic theory is a fundamental issue. By the same token, in this article to identify areas of comparative advantages in using convection-share during the period (1392-1379) is considered. The results show that most provinces the regional share of positive structural effect on the sectors of agriculture, fisheries, industry, construction, hotels and restaurants, water, electricity and natural gas, wholesale, retail, repair of motor vehicles and goods transportation transport, storage and communications, healthcare and real estate, rental and business services and it represents areas of comparative advantage in the sector. decreases in the production area. Education sector, East Azarbaijan, Isfahan, Ilam, Tehran, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Semnan, Iran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Gilan, central, public office and service in the city of West Azarbaijan, Ilam, Tehran, Semnan, such characteristics are but due to the fact that their contribution to the economy of each province is notable identify the reasons for their poor performance is inevitable

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Comparative Advantage
  • Economic Growth
  • convection-share
  • Provinces
APEC. (2000). "Towards Knowledge Based Economies in APEC". Report by APEC Economic Committee (EC)
Al Shami, A., Lotfi, A., Coleman, S., & Dostál, P. (2015). Unified knowledge based economy hybrid forecasting. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 91, pp.107-123.
Atikinson, R.D., & Randolph H.C. (1998). the New Economy Index: Understanding America's Economic Transformation. Washington, D.C.: Progressive Policy Institute. http:// www. Neweconomyindex.org.
Australia Bureau of Statistics (ABC) (2002). Measuring a Knowledge- based Economy and Society- an Australian Framework Discussion Paper (cat.No. 1375.0(
Benito, M., & Romera, R., (2011). Improving Quality Assessment of Composite Indicators in University Rankings: a Case Study of French and German Universities of Excellence, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Statistics and Econometrics Series 15. Working Paper, 11-20
Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H., Wojcak. E., & Polakova, M. (2014). Dynamics of Changes Toward Knowledge-based Economy in Slovak SMEs. 10th International Strategic Management Conference, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (150): 637 – 647.
Bell, W., (2008). Foundations of futures studies. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Carayannis, E.G., Ferreira., J.M., Jalali, M.S., & Ferreira, A.F.(2018). MCDA in knowledge-based economies: Methodological developments and real world applications, Technological Forecasting & Social Change (In Press).
Cornish, Edward., (2007). "The Study of the Future" : An Introduction to the Art and Science of Understanding and Shaping Tomorrow's World USA, World Future Society.
DeVol, R,C., et al., (2011). State Technology and Science Index 2010: Enduring Lessons for the Intangible Economy. Milken Institute. www.milkeninstitute.org.
Dahlman, C., & Anderson, T., (2000). "Korea and Knowledge- Based Economy. Making the Transition". World Bank Institute.
Dworak, E., (2010). Analysis of knowledge-based economy impact on economic development in the European Union countries. Comparative economic research, 13(4): 5-25.
Finne, H., Day, A., Piccaluga, A., Spithoven, A., Walter, P.,& Wellen, D., (2011). A Composite Indicator for Knowledge Transfer. Report from the European Commission’s Expert Group on Knowledge Transfer Indicators.
Galbraith, B., R. McAdam Woods, J., & McGowan, T., (2017). “Putting Policy into Practice: An Exploratory Study of SME Innovation Support in a Peripheral UK Region.Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29 (7–8): 668–691. doi:10.1080/08985626.2017.1325939.
Glenn, J., & Gordon, T., (2003). “A Tool for Scenario Planning", CD ROM the Millennium, Project, American Coouncil for the United Nations University
Godet, M., (2008). “Strategic Foresight”, Lipsor Working Paper, Paris
Godin, Benoit., (2003). the Emergence of S&T Indicators: Why Did Governments Supplement Statistics with Indicators? Research Policy. 32.
Hoover, W., (2009).  "The Future of Human Resources”: Technology Assists in Streamliing your HR Department. Colorado Biz.
Kanpinit, Kachakoch., (2008). Composite Indicators for Educational Quality Management for a Master’s Degree Program in Educational Administration in Private Higher Education Institutions in Thailand. Other Degree Thesis. Victoria University.
Lee, J.N., Ham, J., & Choi, B., (2016). Effect of Government Data Openness on a Knowledge-Based Economy, Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2016), Procedia Computer Science (91):158 – 167.
Murias, P., et al., (2007). A Composite Indicator for University Quality Assessment: The Case of Spanish Higher Education System. Soc Indic Res. (2008) 89:129–146.
Mejri, K., MacVaugh, J.A., & Tsagdis, D., (2018). Knowledge configurations of small and medium-sized knowledge-intensive firms in a developing economy: A knowledge-based view of business-tobusiness internationalization, Industrial Marketing Management (In Press)
OECD. (1996). Knowledge-based Economy. OECD.
OECD. (2000). Knowledge Management in the Learning Society. OECD.
OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD.
Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E., McDowell, W., & Kraus, S., (2019). Innovation and knowledgebased economy for entrepreneurship and regional development, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development An International Journal. (Online).
Roney, C.W., (2010). "Intersections of Strategic Planning and Futures Studies”: Methodological Complementarities, Journal of Futures Studies, 15(2):71-100.
Schwartz, P., (1996). “The Art of the Long view”, New York: Doubledy.
Stefan, T., (2015). The influence of Knowledge Based Economy on agility of enterprise, 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015Procedia Manufacturing (3):6615 – 6623.
Sundac, D., & fatur, K.L., (2011). Knowledge economy factors and the development of knowledge-based economy. CroEconSur, 13(1): 105-141.
UNDP., (2001). Human Development Report: Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. Oxford University Press.
UNECE., (2002). Towards a Knowledge-based Economy. Country Readiness Assessment Report: Concept, Outline, Benchmarking and Indicators. UNECE. New York – Geneva. Prieiga per internetą: http://www.unece.org/ie/enterp/documents/coverpagregion.pdf.
World Bank., (1998/99).World Development Report- Knowledge for Development. New York: Oxford University Press