بررسی اولویتهای راهبردی سیاستهای پولی و مالی در ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشگاه عدالت، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این مقاله شناسایی چارچوب سیاست‌گذاری مناسب در برای تحقق اهداف سیاست‌های پولی و مالی در جهت ایجاد ثبات در اقتصاد ایران است. رفتار سیاست‌گذاران پولی و مالی با استفاده از روش بهینه‌سازی پویا و الگوی رهبر پیرو نظریه بازی‌ها و تعریف توابع هدف و قیود پیش روی سیاست‌گذاران تحت دو رویکرد اساسی سیاست‌گذاری مصلحتی و تعهد دو سیاست‌گذار، استخراج شد. برآورد پارامترهای مدل نیز در قالب 4 سناریو با استفاده از روش تخمین بیزی انجام گرفت.
بر مبنای یافته‌های تحقیق، سیاست‌گذاری مبتنی بر قاعده و رهبری سیاست‌گذار پولی منجر به افزایش ثبات اقتصادی می‌شود. اهمیت تثبیت تولید و تورم برای سیاست‌گذاران متعهد در مقایسه با سیاست‌گذاران مصلحت‌اندیش بیشتر است. در حالیکه برای یک سیاست‌گذار متعهد تثبیت تورم از تثبیت تولید مهمتر است، برای یک سیاست‌گذار مصلحت اندیش، تثبیت تولید بر تبیت تورم مقدم است. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد تثبیت بدهی عمومی برای بانک مرکزی متعهد نسبت به بانک مرکزی مصلحت‌اندیش اهمیت بسیار بیشتری دارد. سیاست مالی در رویکرد سیاست‌گذاری صلاحدیدی رفتار موافق با ادوار تجاری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study of Strategic Scenarios of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • pari jaafarielilab 1
  • Jaafar Haghighat 2
1 Professor, Faculty of Law, Tabiyat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Adalat University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this paper is to identify an appropriate policy making framework in order to achieve the objectives of monetary and fiscal policies to stabilize the Iran economy. The behavior of monetary and fiscal policy makers was extracted by using the dynamic optimization method and game theory and objective functions definition and constrains facing policy makers under two policymaking approaches: discretion and commitment. Estimation of model parameters was done in 4 scenarios using Bayesian estimation method.
Findings show that, committed monetary leadership led to an increase in economic stability. Output and inflation stabilization is more importance for committed policy makers than discretionary policy makers. While for a committed policy maker the inflation stabilization is more importance than output stabilization. For a discretionary policy maker, the output stabilization is more important than inflation stabilization. The results of research show that for committed central bank, the stabilization of public debt is more importance than for discretionary central bank. The fiscal policy in discretionary policy making approach have pro- cyclical behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • dynamic stochastic general equilibrium
  • discretionary policy making
  • commitment policy making
  • game theory
  • Bayesian estimation method

مراجع

Adam, Klaus, & Billi, Roberto M. (2008). Monetary conservatism and fiscal policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(8), 1376-1388.
Adam, Klaus, & Billi, Roberto M. (2014). Distortionary fiscal policy and monetary policy goals. Economics Letters, 122(1), 1-6.
Asgharpoor H. (2005). Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Shocks on Production and Prices in Iran. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Economics. Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran. (Persain)
Asgharpoor H., Salmani B., Oskooyi B. and niki K. (2005). Empirical Analysis of Financial Dominance in the Iran Economy: A Structural Self-Explaining Approach. Economic Policy Making, 7(13): 133-162. (Persain)
Dai, Meixing, Sidiropoulos, Moïse, & Spyromitros, Eleftherios. (2015). Fiscal policy, institutional quality and central bank transparency. The Manchester School.
Daly, Hounaida. Coordination of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in France: An Empirical Overview.
Daly, Mounir Smida. (2014). Policy Mix and Economic Performance in Euro Area. Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 14(8).
Davig, Troy, & Leeper, Eric M. (2011). Monetary–fiscal policy interactions and fiscal stimulus. European Economic Review, 55(2), 211-227.
Demirel, Ufuk Devrim. (2012). The value of monetary policy commitment under imperfect fiscal credibility. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(6), 813-829.
Dosi, Giovanni, Fagiolo, Giorgio, Napoletano, Mauro, Roventini, Andrea, & Treibich, Tania. (2015). Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 52, 166-189.
Fakhr hosseini F. (2011). Stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model for monetary business periods of the Iran economy. Quarterly  of Economic Modeling Research .1 (3): 1-28. (Persain)
Farazand H., Ghorban nejad M. and Purjavan A. (2013). Determining the rules of optimal monetary and fiscal policy in the Iranian economy. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policy, 21(67), 69-88. (Persain)
Favero, Carlo A, & Monacelli, Tommaso. (2005). Fiscal policy rules and regime (in) stability: evidence from the US.
Kirsanova, Tatiana, & le Roux, Stephanus. (2011). Degree of policy precommitment in the UK: an empirical investigation of monetary and fiscal policy interactions.
Kirsanova, Tatiana, & Le Roux, Stephanus Daniel. (2013). Commitment vs. Discretion in the UK: An Empirical Investigation of Monetary and Fiscal Policy Regime. Discretion in the UK: An Empirical Investigation of Monetary and Fiscal Policy Regime (March 16, 2013).
Kirsanova, Tatiana, Stehn, Sven Jari, & Vines, David. (2005). The interactions between fiscal policy and monetary policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(4), 532-564.
Komeyjani A. and Tavakolian H. (2012). Monetary policy dominated by fiscal and implicit target inflation in the form of a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model for the Iran economy. Quarterly of  Economic Modeling Research, 8, 87-111. (Persain)
Libich, Jan, & Nguyen, Dat Thanh. (2015). Strategic Monetary–Fiscal Interactions in a Downturn. Economic Record.
Moshiri S., Mosavi nik H. and Bagheri pormehr SH.(2011). Investigating the degree of dominance of fiscal policy in the Iranian economy in the form of a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 2(5), 21-42. (Persain)
Niemann, Stefan. (2011). Dynamic monetary–fiscal interactions and the role of monetary conservatism. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(3), 234-247.
Sabagh kermani M., Yavari K., Mosavi nik H. and Bagheri pormehr SH. (2014). Investigating the Effect of Financial Sovereignty on the Inflation Rate of Iran's Economy in the Framework of a Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model ". Journal of Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development). 14(1), 2-26. (Persain)
Taghi pur A. and Manzur D. (2015). Establishing a Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model for the Small Open Oil Exporter Economy: A Case Study of Iran. Journal of Economic Research, 23(75), 7-44. (Persain)
Taghi pur A. and Manzur D. (2016). Analysis of the effects of monetary shocks and financial government expenditures in Iran using a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Research, 51(4), 977-1001. (Persain)
Vali allah S. (2015). Inconsistency of monetary and fiscal policies and its effect on the banking system. Proceedings of the 24th Islamic Banking Conference. Tehran. Monetary and Banking Research Institute. Summer 2015. (Persain)
Zarei J. (2015). Financial rules and inflation targeting.. Policy Notes, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (Persain)
Zerae nejad M. and Anvari E. (2012). Determining the optimal monetary and fiscal policies of the Iranian economy in an atmosphere of uncertainty using the macroeconomic microeconomic model. Journal of Monetary and Financial Economics, 19(3), 1-28. (Persain)

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار