مفهوم‌سازی و کاربست دولت ناب، فراروی تحقق سیاست‌های کلی نظام اداری

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، رشتۀ مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران غرب، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد الکترونیکی تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از تحقیق حاضر مفهوم‌سازی و کاربست «دولت ناب»، فراروی تحقق سیاست‌های کلی نظام اداری ایران است. این پژوهش به‌لحاظ پارادایم‌شناسی، در فازِ اکتشافِ مدل تفسیری و در فازِ آزمونِ مدل اثبات‌گرا قرار دارد و به‌لحاظ کلی پراگماتیسم و مخاطب‌شناسی کاربردی است. رویکرد تحقیق آمیخته و استراتژی به‌کارگرفته‌شده در آن تحلیل مضمون است. برای تحلیل داده‌های کیفی از روش کلارک (2006) و نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا (MAXQDA) استفاده شد. روش نمونه‌گیری در فاز کیفی هدفمند بود و حجم نمونۀ کیفی را خبرگان حوزۀ دانشگاهی شامل استادان و اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه و مدیران ارشد سازمان‌های دولتی تشکیل داد که درمجموع با بیست نفر خبره برای جمع‌آوری داد‌ه‌های کیفی مصاحبه شد. جامعۀ آماری بخش کمّی نیز مدیران و کارشناسان ستادی یکی از وزارتخانه‌های دولتی مستقر در شهر تهران است. پرسش‌نامۀ تحقیق به‌منظور جمع‌آوری داده‌های کمّی مطابق با تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی تدوین شد. در بخش کمّی، روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده بود که با استفاده از نرم‌افزار تعیین حجم نمونه G power در سطح آلفای 1/0 و توان آزمون 85/0 درصد، 130 نفر به عنوان نمونۀ نهایی تحقیق بررسی شدند. روایی محتوا به‌وسیلۀ ابزار CVI, CVR با پنل خبرگان تأیید شد. روایی سازۀ مدلِ اندازه‌گیری (روایی واگرا + روایی هم‌گرا) از طریق آزمون‌های میانگین واریانس استخراجی، فورنل و لارکر، و ماتریس چندخصیصه و چندشاخصه مورد تأیید قرار گرفت و پایایی مدل نیز با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، پایایی ترکیبی و پایایی اشتراکی بررسی و تأیید شد. آزمون تحلیل مسیر مدل اکتشاف‌شده نیز مطابق با الگوریتم مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری واریانس‌محور با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اس‌پی‌اس‌اس، نسخۀ 24 (SPSS, 24) و اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس، نسخۀ 3 (Smart PLS, 3) بررسی شد. طبق نتایج تحقیق، 24 شاخص و 4 مؤلفه برای این منظور شناسایی و اعتبارسنجی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Conceptualization and Application of the Clean Government: Towards the Realization of the Administrative General Policies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fazel Saydi 1
  • Morteza Mosakhani 2
  • Sedighe Tootian Esfehani 3
  • Shahrazad Tayaran 4
1 PhD Candidate of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University West Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the current study is to conceptualize and apply pure government within the general policies of administrative system. It is paradigmatic in nature, and in two interpretive explorative phase and confirmatory modelling phase. It is generally a pragmatic and practical study. The research method is mixed-method and content analysis. To analyze the qualitative data, Clark’s method (2006) and MAXQDA software were employed. Purposeful sampling was done in the qualitative phase including elites of the universities such as professors, faculties, and the higher managers of the governmental organizations, resulting in 20 individuals. The sample for the quantitative phase include the managers and staff of the governmental organizations in Tehran. The questionnaire for collecting quantitative data was designed based on the confirmatory factor analysis. In the quantitative phase, the sampling was random, the size of which was decided by G-power program at 0.1 alpha and test power of 0.85%, resulting in 130 participants. The validity of the content was confirmed by CVR, CVI by elite panels. The validity of the measuring structure model (convergent and divergent) was confirmed by variance, Fornel and Lacker, and multifactorial matrix. The reliability of the model was tested through Cronbach alpha, test-retest, and parallel methods. The exploratory model was designed based on variance-based structured equation modelling through SPSS 24 and Smart PLS 3. The findings showed 24 indexes and 4 elements.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pure government
  • general policies of the administrative system
  • analysis of the theme
Abaidoo, K., & Blankenberger, B. (2022). Lean and public organization performance: The Wisconsin lean government initiative at the Wisconsin department of health services. Public Performance & Management Review, 1-31.‏
Ali, S. A. M. (2021). Networks of effectiveness? the impact of politicization on bureaucratic performance in Pakistan. The European Journal of Development Research, 1-21.‏
Amanda, K. D. (2015). Bureaucracy, sociology. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 913-918).
Azimi, S., & Hashemi, M. (2016). Correct administrative system between ideals and realities based on the administrative and political systems of Iran. MA thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Branch, Faculty of Law. (Persain)
Baykut, L. (2010). Opportunities for lean enterprise in public regional transportation.‏ ETD Archive. Cleveland State University.
Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., Hulstijn, J., van Wijk, R., de Winne, N., & Tan, Y. H. (2011). Towards a lean-government using new IT-architectures for compliance monitoring. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 147-156).‏
Boräng, F., Cornell, A., Grimes, M., & Schuster, C. (2018). Cooking the books: Bureaucratic politicization and policy knowledge. Governance, 31(1), 7-26.
Caiado, R. G. G., Carocha, D. M., Goulart, A. K., & Tortorella, G. L. (2020). Critical success factors-based taxonomy for Lean Public Management: A systematic review. Production, 30.‏ 112-154.
Chalil, T. M. (2020). Fiscal grants and government expenditures in post Indonesia big-bang decentralization.‏
Cohen, N., Mizrahi, S., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2022). Alternative provision of public health care: the role of citizens' satisfaction with public services and the social responsibility of government. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 17(2), 121-140.‏
Cooper, C. A. (2018). Bureaucratic identity and the resistance of politicization. Administration & Society, 50(1), 24-36.
Deshmukh, M., & Jain, A. (2022). Lean-SE: framework combining lean thinking with the SDLC process. In Ubiquitous Intelligent Systems (pp. 127-133). Springer, Singapore.‏
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1959). Bureaucracy, bureaucratization, and debureaucratization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 302-320.‏
Flumerfelt, S., & Green, C. (2022). Graduate lean leadership education: a case study of a program. In Training Engineering Students for Modern Technological Advancement (pp. 202-224). IGI Global.‏
Garcia, R. M., & Burns, S. L. (2022). Bureaucratic politics in protected areas: The voided power projection efforts of conservation vis-a-vis forest bureaucracies in Patagonia, Argentina. Forest Policy and Economics, 134, 102-630.‏
Garcia, R. M., & Burns, S. L. (2022). Bureaucratic politics in protected areas: The voided power projection efforts of conservation vis-a-vis forest bureaucracies in Patagonia, Argentina. Forest Policy and Economics, 134, 102-630.‏
Ghasemi, Sh., Memarzadeh Tehran, Gh., Jazani, N.,  Sayad, S., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2022). A model for selecting the managers of public enterprises considering paragraphs 3 and 4 of the general policies of the administrative system. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 10(1), 42-72. (Persain)
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 5(5/6), 320-340.
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994-1011.
Holweg, M. (2007). The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 420-437.‏
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1-S8.‏
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1-S8.‏
Kargar Shooraki, H., Mirghafoori, H., Zareahmadabadi, H., & Soltani, A. (2016). Future studies of convergent technology in the administrative system of Iran. MA thesis, Yazd University, Faculty of Management and Accounting. (Persain)
Kargar Shoorki, H., Mirghafoori, H., Soltani, A., & Zareahmadabadi, H. (2020). Future studies of convergent administrative system in Iran. Management of Governmental Organizations, 8(3), 155-166. (Persain)
Klimek, J. A. (2020). Multi-criteria assessment of the bureaucracy in Poland-the individual decision-making aspect. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2434-2444.‏
Klimek, J. A. (2020). Multi-Criteria Assessment of the Bureaucracy in Poland-the Individual Decision-Making Aspect. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2434-2444.‏
Kristensen, T. B., & Israelsen, P. (2014). Performance effects of multiple control forms in a Lean organization: A quantitative case study in a systems fit approach. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 45-62.‏
Ludwiczak, A. (2018). Using lean government in improvement of the services in public administration on the example of Marshal’s Office in Lubuskie voivodeship. European Journal of Service Management, 26, 145-153.
Mehrabani Majd, L. (2019). Citizenship and organizational rights in Iran's administrative system. Administrative Studies and Researches, 7(20), 28-47. (Persain)
Mohammadzadeh Kalati, M., Memarzadeh Tehran, Gh., Kameli, M., Naghavi, M., Kazemi, M. (2021). A model for the policies of human resources in governmental organizations of Iran considering the general administrative policies. Macro and Strategic Policies, under publication. (Persain)
Mohammadi, H., Alvani, S. M., Memarzadehtehran, Gh., & Hamidi, N (2020). Considerately of Iran administrative system's managerial dimension. Public Administration Perspective, 11(3), 15-38. (Persain)
Molina, J. L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2021). Moral bureaucracies and social network research. Social Networks, 67, 13-19.‏
Neverov, K. (2020). Participatory governability under development: The institution of citizen participation as the basis for the design of the “Government as a Platform” in developing countries. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on WWW/INTERNET 2020. Virtual Conference, 18-20 November, 2020 (pp. 145-149). IADIS Press.
Nguyen, P., Rao, R., Brown, V., McConnell, M., Barendt, N. A., Zingale, N. C., & Loparo, K. A. (2020). A scalable pavement sensing, data analytics, and visualization platform for lean governance in smart communities. In 2020 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) (pp. 313-318). IEEE.‏
Nunez-del-Prado, M., & Rojas-Bustamante, L. (2022). Government public services presence index based on open data. In Annual International Conference on Information Management and Big Data (pp. 50-63). Springer, Cham.‏
Orr, C. (2005). Lean leadership in construction. In 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference: Proceedings (p. 345). International Group on Lean Construction.‏
Radnor, Z. (2010). Transferring Lean into government. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(3), 411-428.‏
Ringel, Y., Maharshak, N., Ringel-Kulka, T., Wolber, E. A., Sartor, R. B., & Carroll, I. M. (2015). High throughput sequencing reveals distinct microbial populations within the mucosal and luminal niches in healthy.
Gut Microbes, 6(3), 173-181.
Romanelli, M. (2017). Rethinking public organizations as knowledge-oriented and technology-driven organization. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(4), 559-576.‏
Salim Zadeh, M., Alvadari, H., & Dalir, M. (2019). E-government in the television organizations of Iran. MA thesis, Payam Nour University, West Branch. (Persain)
Shaw, D. R., Achuthan, K., Sharma, A., & Grainger, A. (2019). Resilience orchestration and resilience facilitation: How government can orchestrate the whole UK ports market with limited resources–the case of UK ports resilience. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 252-263.
Simamora, J. M., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2020). The lean government development on public services over publishing letter police record at state police office, Indonesian Republic. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic, 4(2), 70-76.‏
Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D., & Pipan, K. K. (2010). Quality improvement methodologies–PDCA cycle, RADAR matrix, DMAIC and DFSS. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 43(1), 476-483.‏
Sunaryanto, K., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2019). Application of lean thinking development: a case study over Badan Pendapatan Daerah (BAPENDA), South Tangerang based on lean government. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic, 3(1), 20-26.‏
Tavakoli, S., & Noorbakhsh, M. (2020). Empowering the staff in the administrative sector. Journal of Governmental Management, 5, 58-62. (Persain)
Thedvall, R., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2013). Engaging in classifications and standardizations: lean public management in public preschools and the social insurance agency in Sweden. In 112th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association (AAA), Chicago, USA, 20-24 November, 2013.‏
Tootian Esfahani, S., Rajabi Farjad, H., & Naghavi, B. (2022). Designing a policy model with a general policy approach of the administrative system. Macro and Strategic Policies, 10(2), 272-292.  (Persain)
Vanichchinchai, A. (2021). Relationships among lean, service quality expectation and performance in hospitals. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(2), 473-457.
Zaruba, N. A., & Egorova, N. N. (2016). Lean governance as a condition for the creation of intellectual coal industry. In Coal in the 21st Century: Mining, Processing and Safety (pp. 39-44).‏  Atlantis Press.