سیاست‌های راهبردی در طراحی و ارزیابی توسعۀ سیاسی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، رشتۀ مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بناب، بناب، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بناب، بناب، ایران

چکیده

در این تحقیق، تأثیر سیاست‌های راهبردی در طراحی و ارزیابی توسعۀ سیاسی بر فرایند توسعۀ سیاسی کشورهای آسیایی (ایران، ترکیه و کرۀ جنوبی) تحلیل شد. وجه مشترک این کشورها مدرنیزاسیون اقتدارگرایانه بود. نظام‌های اداری بر بستری از نظام‌های سیاسی قرار دارد و بوروکراسیِ دولتیِ کارآمد توان و ظرفیت دولت‌ها برای قدم نهادن در مسیر توسعه را تسهیل می‌کند. توسعۀ سیاسی تعادلی مناسب‌ترین سیاست راهبردی برای ایجاد تعادل بین دو سیستم اداری و سیاسی در فرایند توسعه است. سؤال اصلی تحقیق عبارت است از: سیاست‌های راهبردی در طراحی و ارزیابی مدل ارزیابی توسعۀ سیاسی در کشورهای آسیایی چگونه است؟ در این تحقیق، از روش پیمایشی و مطالعات تطبیقی استفاده شد و داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس (Smart PLS) تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل گردید. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان داد کشورها برمبنای توانایی تبدیل قابلیت‌های نظام‌های اداری به ظرفیت‌های سیاسی می‌توانند توسعه یابند. توسعۀ نظام سیاسی بدون اجماع نخبگان سیاسی حول محور برنامه‌های توسعه و برنامه‌ریزی بلندمدت و بدون ایجاد نظام‌های اداری مدرن و نهادهای مدرن سیاسی امکان‌پذیر نیست و بدون ثبات، مشارکت و پاسخ‌گویی سیاسی و تثبیت نهادهای سیاسی، امکان برگشت و انحطاط توسعۀ سیاسی وجود دارد. طبق نتایج تحقیق، وضعیت کرۀ جنوبی بهتر از ترکیه و ایران است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Strategic Policies in Designing and Evaluating Political Development

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmail Kholafazadeh Astmal 1
  • Gholamreza Memarzadeh Tehran 2
  • Nader Bohloli Zeinab 3
  • Yousef Beighzadeh 3
1 PhD Candidate of Public Management, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University Bonab Branch, Bonab, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Management, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University Bonab Branch, Bonab, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this study, the effect of strategic policies in designing and evaluating political development in certain Asian countries (Iran, Turkey, and South Korea) has been analysed. These countries were in common in authoritarian modernization. Administrative systems are grounded on political systems, and an efficient government bureaucracy can help the governments be able to step into developments. An equilibrium political development is the most suitable strategic policy to create a balanced relationship between the two administrative political systems in the development process. The main question is that what the strategic policies in designing and evaluating political development in Asian countries are. This study has been done using survey method and comparative studies; the data, also, has been analysed using Smart PLS software. The findings of this research showed that the more the capabilities of administrative systems transform into political capacities, the more countries can develop. The development of the political system is not possible without the general agreement of the political elites around long-term development and planning programs and without the creation of modern administrative systems and modern political institutions. Without stability, participation and political accountability, and stabilization of political institutions, there is a possibility of regression and degeneration of political development. According to the results, the situation of South Korea is better than Turkey and Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Administrative system
  • political systems
  • government
  • development
  • equilibrium political development

مراجع

Abdolahi, M., & Raad, F. (2009). Study of transformation and structural impediments of political development in Iran (1925-2003). Iranian Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 30-31. (Persain)
Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran between two revolutions (from the constitutional revolution to Islamic revolution) (translated into Farsi by K. Firouzmand, H. Shams Avari, & M. Modir Shanechi). Tehran, Iran: Markaz Publication. (Persain)
Aminzade, M. (1982). Political development. Political & Economic Ettelaat, 117-118, 104-117. (Persain)
Chamlou, N. (2019). Iran’s economic performance since the 1979 Revolution. Atlantic Council. Iran’s economic performance since the 1979 Revolution - Atlantic Council
Etebarian Khourasgani, A., & Gholipour Moghaddam, M. (2017). A comparative review of political development theories. International Journal of Business Management and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 126-139. (Persain)
Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy & growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of "Weberian" state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5),748-765.
Ghaderi, R., Pouriani, M. H., & Mohseni Tabrizi, R. (2020). A comparative study of Iran and South Korea development programs over the past four decades with an emphasis on economic-political development. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 12(48), 89-107. (Persain)
Heady, F. (2009). Public administration: A comparative perspective (translated into Farsi by Gh. Memarzade Tehran, & S. M. Alvani). Tehran: Andisheh-haye Gohar-bar. (Persain)
Hong, T. Y. (2013). A comparative study on the role of government and civil society in socio-economic development of South Korea and Iran (1961-1979) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Isfahan. (Persain)
Huntington, S. (1984). Will more countries become democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2),193-218.
Johari, J. C. (1993). Comparative politics (3rd ed.). Uk: Sterling Publication.
McQuail, D. (2009). McQuail's mass communication theory: An introduction (translated into Farsi by P. Ejlali; 3rd ed.). Tehran: Bureau of Media Development and Studies. (Persain)
Moeinipour, M. (2009). A comparative study between Huntington's political development model with political growth model in Mahdavi society. Mashreq-e Mouood, 3(12), 86-87. (Persain)
Pye, L. (1965). The concept of political development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 358, 1-13.
Pye, L. W. (2001). Crises and sequences in political development (translated into Farsi by Gh. Khajeh Sarvari). Tehran: Saheb Kowsar Publication. (Persain)
Riggs, F. (1964). Administration in developing countries: The theory of prismatic society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalization. London and New York: Routledge.
Safarian, R., Shahramnia, A. M., Masoudnia, H., & Makki, P. (2017). The structure of administrative system and political development during the Reformation era. Political and International Approaches, 9(51), 121-146. (Persain)
Sariolghalam, M. (2020). Iran’s rationality and development. Tehran: Farzan Rouz Publishers. (Persain)
Waldo, D. (1984). The Administration state: The study of the political theory of American public administration. New York: Routledge.
Press freedom index. (2022, December 8). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index .2002-2020
The Global Economy. (2022, December 1). State legitimacy index - Country rankings. State legitimacy index by country, around the world | TheGlobalEconomy.com The Global Economy. (2022, December 1). State legitimacy index - Country rankings. State legitimacy index by country, around the world | TheGlobalEconomy.com.
https://bti-project.org/de/meta/downloads.html
https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/state_legitimacy_index/
https://data.worldbank.org/
https://www.prosperity.com/
http://www.li.com/

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار