Impact of Savings and Investment on Iran's Economic Growth in the presence of Structural Break

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 MSC. student in Economics University of Sistan and Baluchestan

2 Associate professor, Faculy of economics, University of Sistan and aluchestan

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the long-run relationship between saving and investment on Iran`s economic growth, with emphasis on the structural breaks during 1960-2016. To achieve this goal, the Zivot & Andrews unit root tests are used for determining the endogenous structural changes and comparing traditional cointegration test Engle-Granger and in absence of the structural breaks with Gregory-Hansen and Saikkonen & Lutkepohl in the presence of the structural breaks. This article differs with other studies in Iranian economy for three reasons: attention to the long-run effects saving and investment have on economic growth in the form a multivariate model, attention to structural breaks in unit root test and cointegration tests, and estimating endogenous break point. Cointegration tests results in absence of structural breaks indicate that there is no long-run equilibrium relationship between model variables, while the results cointegration tests in the presence of structural breaks indicate a long-run (and positive) equilibrium relationship between the variables of the pattern.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Budhedeo, Sh. (2015). “ Saving and Economic Growth in India: Estimation Long-run Relationship”,13th International Workshop on Pensions, Insurance and Savings University Paris Dauphine.
Gragory, A. W, Hansen, B. E. (1996). “Residual- based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts”, Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99-126.
Jagadeesh, D. (2015),  “The Impact of Savings in Economic Growth: An Empirical Study Based on Botswana”, International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management 10-21.
Kebede Hundie, Sh, (2014), “Saving, Investment and economic growth in Ethiopia: Evidence from ARDL approach to co-integration and TYDL Granger-causality tests”. Journal of Economics and International Finance.
Lutkepohl, H and Wolters, J (2003),”Transmission of German Monetary Policy in the Pre-Euro Period”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 7, 711.
Nwanne, T. (2014). “Implication of Saving and Investment on Economic Growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research.
      Pahlavani, M, Verma, R and Wilson, E,(2006), “The Role of Capital Formation and Saving in Promoting Economic Growth in Iran”, Middle East Business and Economic Review, June 2007.
Perron, P. (1989), “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root
Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57(6): 1361-1401.
Shuaib, I.M and Dania Evelyn Ndidi (2015), “Capital Formation: Impact on the Economic Development of Nigeria 1960-2013European Journal of Business, Economic and Accountancy.
Saikkonen, P and Lutkepohl, H (2000a), “Testing for the Cointegtating Rank of a VAR Process with an Intercept”, Econometric Theory, 16(3), 373-406.
Saikkonen, P and Lutkepohl, H (2000b), “Testing for the Cointegtating Rank of a VAR Process with Structural Shift”, Journal of Business and Economic Statastics, 18(4), 451-464.
Saikkonen, P and Lutkepohl, H (2000c), “Trend Adjustment Prior to Testing for the Cointegration Rank of a Vector Autoregressive Process”, Journal of Time Series
Tehranchian, A. M and Behravesh, M, (2011), “The relationship between Saving and investment in Iran: Testing Feldstein’s and Horioka’s theory”, Affrican Journal of Business Management.
Zivot, E, and Andrews D.W (1992), “ Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shick, and the Unit Root HypothesisJournal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 70-251.
Stockman, A. C. (1988). Sectoral and national aggregate disturbances to industrial output in seven European countries. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21: 387– 410.