Theoretical Perspective of Structure and Action in Explaining the Adaptation Behavior to Drought

Document Type : Case-study

Authors

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the impact analysis of action and structure on adaptation behavior to drought, that based on documentation and literature review. According to this, the role of agency and structure in social science research and understanding of the world based on social theories, especially structuration theory of Giddens were explained. Then, in the direction of achieving the goals of documents such as document of future perspective and holistic scientific agriculture roadmap, how the relationship between structure and action in drought conditions, as social or environmental context within which people live and work, were analyzed. In the next step, different approaches in the study of adaptation and vulnerability to environmental hazards described. The results showed that all activities adapted to drought appears in the social context, and promotion of adaptive capacity can't be clearly understood without considering the social context, because the context rise to, the design, implementation and use of strategies to provide adaptability. This approach allows a comprehensive analysis and review in accordance with the social realities of local communities on adaptation behavior to drought will provide, and thus linking the macro strategies of adaptation to micro strategies of local communities in the areas of adaptability, vulnerability and resilience studies to environmental hazards such as drought will be even.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Adger, W.N. et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic change 93(3):335–354
Adger, W.N., (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development 27, 249–269.
Adger, W.N., (2001). Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Journal of International Development 13 (7), 921–931.
Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. International Forestry Research and Institutions Program (IFRI) Working Paper (W08I-3).
Agrawala, S., Broad, K., Guston, D.H., (2001) .Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision making: challenges to an emergent boundary organization. Science Technology and Human Values 26, 454–477.
Barnett, J., (2001)‌ . Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island Countries: the problem of uncertainty. World Development 29, 977–993.
Broad, K., Agrawala, S., (2000). The Ethiopia food crisis: uses and limits of climate forecasts. Science 289, 1693–1694.
Brooks, N., Adger, W.N., (2004). Country level risk indicators from outcome data on climate-related disasters: an exploration of the EM-DAT database. Ambio.
Bryant, C.R., B. Smit, M. Brklacich, T.R. Johnston, J. Smithers, Q. Chiotti, and B. Singh, (2000)‌ : Adaptation in Canadian agriculture to climatic variability and change. Climatic Change , 45(1), 181–201.
Cutter, S.L., (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20, 529–539.
Dessai, S. & Hulme, M. 2004. Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Climate Policy, 4: 107–128.
Engle, N. L. (2011).Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change.
Engle, N. L. (2011)‌ .. Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647-656.
Fankhauser, S., J.B. Smith, and R.S.J. Tol, (1999). Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecological Economics, 30(1), 67–78.
Giddens A . (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, Cambridge
Giddens, Anthony. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haddad, B.M., (2005). Ranking the adaptive capacity of nations to climate change when socio-political goals are explicit. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15 (2), 165–176.
IPCC, (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Milly, P.C.D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R.M., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Lettenmaier, D.P., Stouffer, R.J., (2008)‌ . Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319 (5863), 573–574.
O’Brien, K., Sygna, L., Haugen, J.E., (2004). Vulnerable or resilient? A multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway. Climatic Change 64, 193–225.
O’Brien, K.L., Leichenko, R.M., (2000)‌ . Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 10, 221–232.
Ogallo, L.A., Boulahya, M.S., Keane, T., (2000). Applications of seasonal to interannual climate prediction in agricultural planning and operations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 103, 159–166.
Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2010). Integrating perspectives on adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance, 1–19.
Reilly, J. and D. Schimmelpfennig, (2000)‌ : Irreversibility, uncertainty, and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change. Climatic Change, 45(1), 253–278.
Smit, B., I. Burton, R.J.T. Klein, and J. Wandel, (2000): An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change , 45, 223–251.
Smith, J. B., Klein, R. J., & Huq, S. (2003). Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press.
Sydneysmith, R., M. Andrachuk, B. Smit, and G.K. Hovelsrud. (2010)‌ . “Vulnerability and adaptive capacity in Arctic communities.” Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance 133–156.
Tompkins, E.L., Adger, W.N., (2005). Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environmental Science & Policy 8, 562–571.
van Aalst, M.K., Fankhauser, S., Kane, S.M., Sponberg, K.,.( 2000) Climate Information and Forecasting for Development: Lessons from the 1997/98 El Nino. World Bank, Washington, DC.