Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies

Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies

Monetary and Fiscal Policies and Welfare Indicators in the Iranian Economy: Emphasis on Macro-Level Policy Frameworks

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student , Department of Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics,Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran;
3 Professor, Department of Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran
4 Associate professor, Department of Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran,Iran;
10.30507/jmsp.2025.483559.2767
Abstract
Monetary and fiscal policies are primarily implemented to promote economic growth and control inflation; however, these policies can influence a society's welfare indicators through various channels. Some of these channels include the inflation rate effect, wealth effect, interest rate effect, and the channel of social support and welfare expenditures. It is evident that in the Iranian economy, the success or failure of these policies first manifests in the increase or decrease in the general price level, and subsequently affects welfare indicators through the aforementioned channels. Therefore, in this study, the inflation rate is considered the outcome of monetary and fiscal policies in Iran, and the trends of some key welfare indicators influenced by this variable during the period 1392–1402 (2013–2023) are analyzed.Overall, the analysis of statistics shows that inflation has grown significantly over the past decade, while welfare indicators, including the misery index, the share of supportive pensions in total expenses, the purchasing power of supportive pensions, real wages, poverty rate, and poverty depth, have sharply declined. Furthermore, the examination of the linear relationship between inflation and the Gini coefficient (as a measure of more balanced income distribution) with OLS indicates a positive and significant correlation, proving the impact of monetary and fiscal policies on welfare through the inflation channel. Hence, considering the emphasis in upstream policy documents on improving societal welfare and the significant influence of inefficient monetary and fiscal policies on welfare over the past decade, it is essential to prioritize welfare considerations in monetary and fiscal policymaking.
Keywords

Subjects


 

Extended abstract

Introduction

Over the past decade, Iran's monetary and fiscal policies have played a significant role in determining social welfare indicators. This article aims to analyze the impacts of these policies by examining trends in variables such as inflation, poverty, income inequality, and purchasing power from 2013 to 2023. The significance of this topic stems from the emphasis placed on social welfare improvement in Iran’s Macro-Level Policy Frameworks, such as the Constitution and the Development Vision Document. For instance, Article 29 of the Constitution refers to the right to social security for all individuals, while Article 43 emphasizes meeting basic needs such as housing, food, and education. However, the analysis reveals that over the past decade, the inflation rate has risen from approximately 8% in 2017 to over 45% in 2023. This upward trend has led to reduced purchasing power, increased poverty rates, and deepened income inequality. The percentage of households below the absolute poverty line rose from 19.4% in 2011 to 30% in 2021, with the poor population exceeding 25.6 million people. These conditions have resulted in social unrest and instability, contributing to diminished social capital.

The literature on welfare began with the works of Alfred Marshall and Arthur Pigou. Marshall highlighted the importance of resource and wealth distribution for welfare improvement, while Pigou introduced concepts such as "external costs," emphasizing the government's role in addressing market failures to enhance welfare. Modern theories expanded through the works of Hicks and Samuelson, which examined the effects of economic policies (monetary and fiscal) on welfare. Studies in this field have shown that monetary policy can affect welfare in the short term by reducing unemployment and inflation, but these effects are temporary. Expansionary policies create inflation and reduce welfare, whereas contractionary policies may improve the conditions of the poor in the long term by reducing inflation. Mechanisms such as substitution effects, Fisher effects, and wealth and labor income dynamics play a role in income distribution. Over the long term, monetary policies aimed at reducing inflation and economic volatility contribute to sustainable welfare improvements. Additionally, fiscal policies enhance welfare through income redistribution, public goods provision, infrastructure investment, and improvements in health and education. Progressive taxation and the reform of indirect taxes can reduce income inequality. Government expenditures in areas such as healthcare, education, and human development positively impact welfare indicators. Environmental policies, such as carbon taxes, also play a key role in enhancing long-term welfare.

Research on welfare in Iran indicates that, in addition to sanctions and economic shocks, mismanagement and ineffective monetary and fiscal policies have significantly contributed to the deterioration of public welfare. Statistical analyses and linear regression models confirm this, revealing the following:

Inflation, as one of the main outcomes of monetary and fiscal policies, has profoundly impacted social welfare. From 2013 to 2023, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by over 570%. This sharp rise has escalated costs for food, healthcare, and education, pushing many households below the poverty line. For instance, household healthcare costs increased by approximately 400% during this period. Meanwhile, real wages have consistently declined since 2018, with workers' purchasing power dropping by over 45%. This situation has left households unable to meet their basic needs.

A key monetary-fiscal policy during this period was the elimination of preferential currency exchange rates. Implemented to reduce fiscal pressure on the government, this policy led to unprecedented increases in the prices of essential goods. Statistics show that within the first four months of its implementation, inflation in the food category exceeded 45%. Moreover, this inflation disproportionately affected lower-income groups, forcing poor households to allocate a larger share of their income to essential expenses, while government support payments failed to compensate for these pressures. For example, in 2023, these payments covered only 1% of urban households' monthly expenses.

A linear relationship between inflation (as the result of ineffective monetary and fiscal policies) and the Gini coefficient indicates that a 10% increase in inflation results in a 7% rise in the Gini coefficient. This implies that inflation, acting as a hidden tax, places the greatest burden on low-income groups and exacerbates income inequality. Instead of promoting fairer income distribution, economic policies have increased wealth concentration among higher-income groups.

Over the past decade, the absolute poverty rate has steadily risen. In 2011, the absolute poverty rate stood at 19.4%, increasing to over 30% in 2021. Additionally, the depth of poverty has worsened. Support payments, a primary tool of the government to reduce poverty, have had limited impact. At best, these payments covered only 30% of rural households' living expenses in 2017, a figure that dropped to less than 2% by 2023.

The misery index, which combines inflation and unemployment rates, has followed an upward trend over the past decade. This index, reflecting the severity of economic and social conditions, has continuously risen, resulting in declining quality of life and increased social dissatisfaction.

The findings of this article reveal that, over the past decade, economic policies have exacerbated poverty, inequality, and reduced quality of life, instead of improving social welfare. To reverse this trend, it is essential for monetary and fiscal policies to be designed and implemented in a coordinated and targeted manner. Key recommendations include controlling inflation through budget deficit reduction, reforming support policies, and improving subsidy structures. Strengthening social policies, such as enhancing access to healthcare and education services, can positively impact poverty reduction and social welfare enhancement. Additionally, fiscal decentralization, by increasing accountability and local competition, can bolster social welfare.

Acharya, S. (2019). The Wealth Effects of Unhedged Interest Rate Exposure. Journal of Monetary Economics, (107), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.07.005.
Alesina, A.; Ardagna, S. & Giavazzi, F. (2019). The Job Crisis: A Survey of the Evidence. In The Handbook of Macroeconomics, (2), 1001-1050. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2019.02.003.
Annett, A. (2007). Social Efficiency and Governance: A Comparative Study of Public Sector Reform. International Monetary Fund.
Atkinson, A. B. & Bourguignon, F. (2015). Handbook of Income Distribution. North-Holland.
Auclert, A. (2019). Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2333–2367. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160137.
Auerbach, A. J. & Feenberg, D. (2000). The significance of federal taxes as automatic stabilizers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 37-56.
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S103-S125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726.
Bashkhor, M. (2023). A look at monetary and economic developments in the form of a non-inflationary growth plan. Economic News, (169), 24-30. (In Persian)
Bavandpour, A.; gholami, H. & doagooyan, D. (2023). Analysis of the position of Iran's welfare state in welfare paradigms with an emphasis on legal standards and Legatum Report 2021 (from theory to practice). The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law5(14), 13-43. doi: 10.22034/mral.2022.559256.1350 (In Persian)
Bayat, M. & Molashahi, M.R. (2022). Investigating the process of dropping out and staying out of education in education and development (2014-2023). Majlis Research Center, Office of Culture and Education Studies. (In Persian)
Bernanke, Ben S. & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27–48. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.27
Bird, R. M. & Zolt, E. M. (2011). Tax Policy in Developing Countries: A New Approach to the Consumption Tax. In The Future of the Welfare State: Reforms and Outcomes (pp. 183-214). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Blanchard, O. & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review, 103(3), 117-120.
Brender, A. & Drazen, A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect the political economy of fiscal decentralization? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1-2), 125-150.
Calderón, C. & Servén, L. (2014). Infrastructure, Growth, and Inequality: An Overview. In The Economics of Infrastructure in a Globalized World: Issues, Lessons and Future Challenges (pp. 13-40). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671557.003.0002.
Card, D.; Kluve, J. & Weber, A. (2018). Active labor market policies: What works in a time of crisis? Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), 321-372.
Cliffe, M. (2021). The Case for Green Consumer Taxes. Green Fiscal Policy Network.
Coibion, O.; Gorodnichenko, Y.; Kueng, L. & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary Policy and Inequality in the U.S. Journal of Monetary Economics, (88), 70-89.
Cutler, D. M. & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). Education and health: Evaluating theories and evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dizaji, S.F.; Farzanegan, M.R. & Naghavi, A. (2016). Political institutions and government spending behavior: theory and evidence from Iran. Int Tax Public Finance 23, 522–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9378-8.
Doepke, M. & Schneider, M. (2006). Inflation and the Redistribution of Nominal Wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 114(6), 1069-1097. https://doi.org/10.1086/508379.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press.
Fahimi, A. & Omati, M.B. (2023). Review of the seventh development bill (41): social support policies. Islamic Council Research Center, Social Studies Office. (In Persian)
Fatás, A. & Mihov, I. (2013). The Stabilizing Role of Automatic Stabilizers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.45.
Ghafari, G. & Azizimehr, K. (2012). Institutional approach and analysis of welfare policies in contemporary’s Iran. Sociological Review, 19(1), 23-56. doi: 10.22059/jsr.2012.56172 (In Persian)
Gornemann, N.; Kuester, K. & Nakajima, M. (2016). Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy. International Finance Discussion Papers, 1167. https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2016.1167.
Gough, I. (2017). Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hicks, J. R. (1939). The Foundations of Welfare Economics. The Economic Journal, 49(196), 696–712.
Iranian Statistics Center (2022). Distribution of income in 2021 in Iran. Iran Statistics Center, Bureau of Labor Population and Household Economy. (In Persian)
Iranian Statistics Center (2023). Summary of the results of the labor force census plan (2023). Iran Statistics Center, Bureau of Population, Labor and Household Economy. (In Persian)
Kaplan, G.; Moll, B. & Violante, G. L. (2018). Monetary Policy According to HANK. American Economic Review, 108(3), 697–743. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160042.
Kaviani, Z. (2023). The state of poverty and the characteristics of the poor in the last decade (90s). Islamic Council, Economic Studies Office (Macroeconomics and Modeling Department). (In Persian)
Le Grand, F.; Martin-Baillon, A. & Ragot, X. (2021). Should monetary policy care about redistribution? Optimal fiscal and monetary policy with heterogeneous agents. Review of Economic Studies, under review for publication.
Len, D. & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. Macmillan.
Marmot, M. (2005). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan and Co.
Mishkin, Frederic S. (1996). The Channels of Monetary Transmission: Lessons for Monetary PolicyNBER Working Papers 5464, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Mousavi, S.A.R. (2023). Examining the concept of back-breaking health costs and policies for financial protection. Islamic Council Research Center, Social Studies Office (Health Group). (In Persian)
Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
Omati, M.B. & Bayat, B. (2024). Evaluation of support policies in the sixth development program of the country (2017-2021), second report: the four areas of social support. Majlis Research Center, Social Studies Office (welfare and social security group). (In Persian)
Omidi, R. (2020). Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 11(1), 103-133. doi: 10.22059/ijsp.2020.79196 (In Persian)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2020). How's life? 2020: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Greening the budget: Trends and policies. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Health at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Ostry, J. D.; Berg, A. & Tsangarides, C. G. (2010). Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin? International Monetary Fund.
Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to Investment in Education: A Decennial Review of Global Literature. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8402. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8402.
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
Romer C. D. & Romer, D. (1999). Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. 84(1), 21-49.
Saeidi, A. A. (2007). Socio- Cultural Aspects of Turkmen Tales The Making of social policy in the post-revolutionary Iran: Challenges and Opportunities. Religion & Communication, 14(31), 69-91. doi: 10.30497/rc.2007.1388 (In Persian)
Salarzadeh, N. & Hashemi Najafabadi, A. (2015). A comparative study of social welfare programs of development plans with the relevant Constitutional Principles of I.R. IRAN. Social Sciences, 21(65), 49-81. doi: 10.22054/qjss.2015.479 (In Persian)
Salimifar, M.; Davoudi, A. & Arabi, A. (2015). Effect of Government budget composition on welfare indicators in Iran. Economic Strategy, 4(12), 153-183. (In Persian)
Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sharifzadegan, M. H. (2016). Critical Evaluation of Welfare Resource Concepts and theories of Iranian Welfare Plans. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 5(1), 127-145. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2016.58380 (In Persian)
Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company.
Taylor-Gooby, Peter. (2013). Reframing Social Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Titmuss, Richard M. (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. Allen & Unwin.
Volume 13, Issue 51
Autumn 2025
Pages 599-632

  • Receive Date 26 October 2024
  • Revise Date 25 January 2025
  • Accept Date 01 February 2025